Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cap / thecap.eth 🎩
@thecap.eth
I submitted a Feature Request to add support for ENS name resolution on L2 chains. If there are Metamask community members that vibe with ENS I'd appreciate some upvotes. :) Me and my team at /namespace are happy to assist with this if necessary. https://community.metamask.io/t/resolve-ens-names-on-l2-chains/28781
2 replies
2 recasts
8 reactions
MetaMask 🦊
@metamask
Thanks for contributing! 150 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cap / thecap.eth 🎩
@thecap.eth
How many votes do we need to have before getting into consideration phase? :) We're at 37 votes after 24 hours and super excited. This should be a fairly easy and yet very significant little upgrade. Thanks.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Rosie 🦊
@rosiej
There's not a set number of votes that are required, but the more the merrier! The product team continuously reviews submitted feature requests.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
cap / thecap.eth 🎩
@thecap.eth
Hmm, I wonder if it would be helpful (and sped up the process) if we submitted a PR on your Github?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Jordan 🦊
@spencecoin
You can, but fwiw the idea of resolving ENS names on L2s is something we have been actively looking into, but no real news at this time. Can't promise you'll get movement if you post to github.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
cap / thecap.eth 🎩
@thecap.eth
Our feature request proposes resolving ENS names on L1 regardless of what EVM-compatible chain the user is connected to. I saw this with other wallets and wondered why not in MetaMask as well. And it would be a relatively quick fix. Resolution on other L2s is something else that’s prob far into the future.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
