Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Kartik pfp
Kartik
@slokh
I think we need to go back to allow fid + user registration without paying for storage. IMO the identity piece is the most interesting part about FC and that should be as accessible as possible. Most FC-adjacent apps won't actually need the rest of the stuff (casts, reactions, etc) Simplifies it for app backends as well: 1. They can immediately onboard users to FC as their identity system (just pay for gas) 2. Use the protocol without broadcasting messages 3. If the user wants to reach the rest of the network, user/app can pay storage and immediately broadcast those messages The part to figure out is the reason it went away in the first place - spam registrations. This is solvable though.
12 replies
7 recasts
58 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
How is a FID useful without data on Hubs?
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Zinger ↑ is job hunting pfp
Zinger ↑ is job hunting
@zinger
But without the context of social interactions how is this better than SIWE?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
What is the core problem you're solving with this, though? The reason FC namespace is useful to import into apps is because it is high fidelity — meaning less spam accounts Why not just have a native namespace and import fids as needed?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noah Bragg 🐟 pfp
Noah Bragg 🐟
@nbragg
Yeah. This change would be amazing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo
💯 I'd also suggest this addition 👇 https://warpcast.com/boscolo.eth/0x599bcd9f
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Law❦︎ pfp
Law❦︎
@traguy.eth
Wait What was the initial idea or reason behind paying for storage? I’ve tried to understand, but i don’t, tbh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Kiraa♡ pfp
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
i had no idea paying storage was not a thing previously, we def need to go back to that. it's hard to onboard people when i tell them you have to pay to give reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Abubakar🎩 pfp
Abubakar🎩
@bigbenz
This would be great if this can be implemented Concurrent storage cost can be demotivating
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bryhmo 🐭🎩🍖 pfp
Bryhmo 🐭🎩🍖
@bryhmo
I completely agree that making the identity piece more accessible is crucial for FC's growth and utility. Allowing user registration without storage fees would definitely lower the barrier for new users and apps. As for the spam issue, maybe we could implement basic anti-spam measures like CAPTCHA or a minimal gas fee to deter bots without deterring genuine users. It’s a balance worth exploring, especially if it simplifies onboarding and integration for developers.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

22 pfp
22
@themuyideen.eth
I dont think there’s a lot of difference, because I don’t see the point in signing up if I can do anything
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Samir 🎩 pfp
Samir 🎩
@0xsamir
So we are saying farcaster can be the most used social login for crypto if it does the fid+ user registration
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

flick the dev 🎩📦 pfp
flick the dev 🎩📦
@flick
let's run up fids to 1 billion
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction