Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
why doesn’t the market care about fully on-chain stuff?
8 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Edmund Edgar (goat/acc) pfp
Edmund Edgar (goat/acc)
@edmundedgar.eth
Hard to build, worse performance, worse UX, hardly anyone is getting legal trouble for running centralized parts (until tornado cash), governance of onchain stuff isn't really solved so you can still get rugged by a malicious decentralized front-end
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
I was referring to like dynamic svg nfts
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

six pfp
six
@six
That’s a good point on the infra layer though
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jtgi pfp
jtgi
@jtgi
cause onchain is most durable compared to alternatives. Closed loop. No dependencies. ipfs requires p2p network with no native incentive layer. arweave is amazing, but will it be around in 10y?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Edmund Edgar (goat/acc) pfp
Edmund Edgar (goat/acc)
@edmundedgar.eth
lol ok sorry, don't pay attention to that stuff
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction