Shipit 🎩

@shipit

65 Following

932 Followers

Shipit 🎩 pfp

I just wanted to share my opinions based on my experience running nodes, rather than mindlessly complaining in the chat. It really seems like the current Quil community is completely overtaken by an OG cartel. If you express an opinion contrary to the will of the OGs, you are immediately labeled as a fudder and subjected to trolling and mockery. It’s truly festering.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

I expressed my opinions as neutrally as possible. Was I kicked out of TG because I hit a nerve and exposed something you didn't want to be revealed? Sure, my mocking about the rewards could be a cultural difference. In the Korean community, I've never seen such excessive amounts being accepted for such simple issues, so that's why I said what I did.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

I was just sharing my opinions on the chats in the community chat. It just so happened that the current topic was full of complaints right after the reward update. I simply talked about it, and now I'm being labeled as someone who continuously spreads FUD? Have you seen all my chat records on TG?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

I respect @0xozgur, a contributor to the release signatories of ceremonyclient. However, he claimed to be a community volunteer while accepting $2000-$3000 in return for helping community members with broken keys.yml files claim their $Quil. As far as I know, this happened twice. When I raised this issue, 0xOzgur kicked me out of the community TG. This project is rotten from the inside. @cassie

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

Dummie! Gimmie! Monnie! xD

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

It is definitely not a decentralized blockchain. Everything changes according to Queen Cassie's wishes, so what is the point of consensus and proof from the nodes?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

Cass had two weeks to update the rewards page, and although the reward calculation method is quite puzzling, she said the current results are her attempt to be as fair as possible. We can't blindly blame her. After announcing the results, they recognized the issues and opened a vote. There's nothing more we can do. If the dramatic increase in emissions proposed as an alternative were to give everyone the existing rewards, it wouldn't be good for me in the long run. I just accept the victory of crappy VPSs in version 18 and hope that the increase in increment in version 19 will progress as expected and improve the rewards.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

Let's calmly reflect on this. Some people saw their first-week rewards, which they thought were final, decrease by 10% to 60%, even when including the second-week rewards. Sure, they expected to own more Quil with the added second-week rewards, but the loss is significant. However, normal miners who received nothing in the first week saw their rewards increase by 2 to 4 times on average through redistribution. This part is fair. But the redistributed Quil was mostly taken by crappy VPSs. I also participated in the second week with 50 poor VPSs, each with 10 instances across 5 hosts, and each VPS was allocated 400 Quil. Additionally, my 9554 machine, which only participated for one day in the second week, received 1600 Quil. This was much more and more efficient than the nodes that participated fully for two weeks.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

I hope you stop using the word "decentralized" for the Quilibrium project. The term PoMW also did not function properly.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

Due to noisy neighbors, the CPU VPS had a steal time of 80% and an actual usage rate of only 20%. During the 1.4.18 period, it had a difficulty metric of 200K and was operational for only 7 days in the second week. Despite this, it received a distribution of 400Q from the 1.4.18 reward redistribution. In 1.4.19, it cannot even mine 1Q per day.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

It seems that as long as a node was run even once during the 1.4.18 period, rewards were distributed equally based on the specs. She probably couldn't fully recover the participation data for the past two weeks. My high-spec node that participated in the network for just one day received more than four times the rewards compared to a mid-range node that participated fully for two weeks. This is a real issue of fairness.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

김치맛좀 볼래? 0xd7d28e9534e4ad2806057aa636ec01a10e760fae

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

파캐스터 뭐라도 해봐..

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

이자식들 다 망해가고 잊혀가니깐 이제서야 뱃지 달아주는거 보소 ㅋㅋ

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

꾸준함이 중요한데 요새는 펄 투표도 계속 밀리는구나..

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

액티브 뱃지 안줄때부터 존망 예감이였다고

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

다들 떠나가도 남아있는 나한테 아직도 액티브 뱃지를 안주는거 봐라!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Shipit 🎩 pfp

아직도 액티브 뱃지를 안주다니

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Rarible pfp

Become an OG. Claim your FREE mint. 1️⃣ - Recast this post 2️⃣ - Follow @rarible 3️⃣ - Claim your Rarible OG NFT Exclusively on Farcaster. https://farcaster.rarible.com/mints/RARI/0x2c57bD140e8E28a9A6aEd519c80510Db33cF4893?20

1603 replies

4205 recasts

3599 reactions

Shipit 🎩 pfp

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction