shiguangtong87

@shiguangtong

15 Following

7 Followers

shiguangtong87 pfp

Good morning ！！ Hope Thursday happily!!

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

shiguangtong87 pfp

good morning ！！ Hope Thursday happily!!

1 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

shiguangtong87 pfp

Good afternoon ！！ it will be weekend, we can go to travel and take photo!! /itookaphoto

0 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

shiguangtong87 pfp

Good afternoon ！！ it will be weekend, we can go to travel and take photo!! /itookaphoto

0 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

shiguangtong87 pfp

Good afternoon ！！ it will be weekend, we can go to travel and take photo!! /itookaphoto

0 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

shiguangtong87 pfp

Share music with them !! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdBzzpq3xV4

0 reply

2 recasts

2 reactions

shiguangtong87 pfp

These repeated break-ins should make consumer-grade hosting environments more secure. Not going to happen at the price points people are accustomed to - they'll simply become professional-grade hosting environments, with a price tag to match. See Amazon's recent cloud HSM announcements - $5000 set-up fee before you get started. Then people will whine about how expensive it all is, and some bright spark will come up with ways to make it cheaper by compromising here and there, and we're back to square one.

1 reply

2 recasts

2 reactions

shiguangtong87 pfp

People cannot simply stop using consumer-grade hosting and jump on a very expensive BTC vault. There must be a demand proportional to the cost of any solution. And demand takes time to grow. Bitcoin is not bootstrapped by anyone, it grows from absolute zero, step by step. This type of shit will gradually happen less and less, but people cannot just decide to use more expensive and robust hosting.

0 reply

2 recasts

1 reaction

shiguangtong87 pfp

The product I spend most of my time working on sells as a managed service to the investment/advice banks, and even though we only deal with the T&C side of things (no money, very little by way of client data (it should be zero client data really, but as names and other identifying info sometimes creep into file-check records and such they have to take precautions based on the service having more than just employee details within)) we have to keep with that sort of standard: ISO27001, everything dedicated including firewall boxes between "their" machines and us (& the rest of the DC, obviously), regular penetration tests, they even require background-checks and other vetting of our staff.

0 reply

2 recasts

1 reaction