Philip Sheldrake pfp

Philip Sheldrake

@sheldrake

85 Following
222 Followers
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Can’t tell them apart tbh. Ideally both will be shut down by regulators.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Sometimes you just see something that makes you smile.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
What is Addresso? Why is Addresso? How can we build Addresso? Where does Addresso take us? All great questions 😁 The Addresso team has answers, but these answers won't be as good as the answers we can figure out together. So thanks for joining in here 😍
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions
Chad Fowler pfp
Chad Fowler
@chadfowler
My colleague @timjrobinson has created a new telegram group for builders looking to defrag ethereum’s liquiidty. Ping me or Tim if you want to join in. Please share with developers you know are working o this. https://paragraph.xyz/@blueyard/how-ethereum-can-solve-l2-liquidity-fragmentation
0 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
@vitalik.eth on stage with @franzi, and Afri out of shot, at ETHBerlin, outlining some of the ongoing challenges of decentralised identity. If you would like a deep dive into the topic, I’d love to point you to: https://generative-identity.org/human-identity-the-number-one-challenge-in-computer-science/
0 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Hi @theperegrine (at least I think this is you; love having to think), here’s the post I mentioned … https://generative-identity.org/web3s-future-fail-is-avoidable/
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
We spoke about ‘natural’ / non-bureaucratic identity and here’s the link I promised: https://generative-identity.org/human-identity-the-number-one-challenge-in-computer-science/ Safe travels home tomorrow.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Hi @austingriffith, good to meet you IRL at #ethberlin. As far as a hackathon on identity goes, your bow tie is one helluva visual identifier. Reckon it took my brain a millisecond to compute. 😃
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Doughnuts.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Destination Berlin. 😁
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
168 hours
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Are you implying that some people don’t???
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
100% I tried to point out the dangers of the metaphor to the SSI community, but let's just say my influence on the matter was minimal! "Not just like a wallet" in ... https://generative-identity.org/the-dystopia-of-self-sovereign-identity-ssi/
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Interestingly, as explicated by the likes of Graeber & Wengrow and other anthropologists over the years, we have been stewarding successfully for 1000s of years predating the modern idea of property. We steward resources because it makes sense. Such social agreement can break down when resources are propertized.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Tx. I don't think we're tooo far apart in thinking tbh. Thankfully the warpcast culture doesn't (yet!) spiral everything down into binary positions. For me, the keyword in your replies is stewardship, often related to but distinct from property. You might like the image here: https://eulerpartners.com/concepts/web3/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
I'd also add ... thank goodness not everyone things solely in terms of property else Farcaster wouldn't exist. Or distributed ledgers. Or the web. Or the internet. Phew.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Not entirely sure why thinking 'not-property' rather than 'property' entails greater specificity? We don't just want any old ideas to flourish, just those that we consider might support human flourishing for example. In other words, there are simple ideas out there that are really bad. Thought is required.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
Data, information, knowledge, etc. These are all anti-rivalrous resources. The concept of property however emerged in the contexts of rivalrous resources. It might be said to have been misapplied in the English Statute Of Monopolies of 1624. But 400 years later we have more tools in our toolbox I think.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
But what if "Read + Write + Own" turns out to an unimaginative response to the potential here? If we want to invent a new paradigm, how many of the old paradigm's concepts do we want to port over? If we're not more selective then this paradigm will look very very very much like the old one.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Philip Sheldrake pfp
Philip Sheldrake
@sheldrake
I think of this particular post as containing one of the best sentences I’ve ever blogged (not that the bar is too high!) … “The #FreeTheNipple campaign was revealing.”
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction