1/* 

I don’t think this movement will age well. 

Removing the aspect of it being A.I. for a moment, the art was generated by a tool that an individual action with a prompt (not unlike a designer clicking on a button to add a stroke to text or a shadow to a shape).

2/*

Thus, the individual should be entitled to copyright. Otherwise, where’s the strike against tools such as Photoshop or Illustrator being used for logo creation or digital canvas pieces?

3/*

 Since it’s the power behind these tools that are generating the visuals behind the art we see plastered everywhere daily, in a fraction of the time it would take to recreate it by hand (which, by the way, is how art got done before computers were a thing).

4/*

So surely if a human’s bare hands didn’t create it, then it shouldn’t be able to be copyrighted? 🤔😅

Being assisted by cutting-edge technology shouldn’t scare us. It has been the way for centuries (printers, cars, mechanical tools, etc., were all cutting edge at some point in history).

5/5

Collectively we must embrace the idea that AI won’t necessarily take our jobs but could enhance our workflow if we use it right💡 

Don’t get scared, get excited.