Law & Policy

Question: If a Safe wallet contract is created with gas paid for by tainted funds (e.g. Tornado Cash), but funds going in/out of the Safe wallet are otherwise untainted, do the funds going out also get tainted?

What if the signers on a Safe are from tainted addresses?

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

Currently: WhatsABI

Maybe adjacently: What if tainted funds pay for gas of an ENS that sets up a pointer to a non-tainted primary address? (Is this a way to troll people?)

Is there a legal (or even a consensus) definition of “tainted”?