shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Interviewing for a job is the same as dating someone new. In both cases, we're trying to figure out if the person will *become* who we need them to be for the role they're applying. With employment, we lean heavily on past experience as a proxy for this, but it's merely a proxy. Someone very adaptable with little relevant experience is a better hire than someone very experienced yet extremely rigid. Imagine we started first dates with a resume reviewing prior relationships? Is that ridiculous? Should hiring be more like dating, or should dating be more like hiring?
4 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Sam (crazy candle person) ✦  pfp
Sam (crazy candle person) ✦
@samantha
I was a recruiter before but I casually used to call myself a matchmaker. I think the difference is the outcome: you date because you love, and you hire because you want to value extract dollars. The process is relatively the same 😂
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Gökhan 🌞 pfp
Gökhan 🌞
@gokhan.eth
this is the ultimate bad take here but i assume manifold love already does this on the dating site. i won't elaborate. i just do not rationalize dating that much.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
Do you mean it'd be a good idea just hypothetically? Cuz practically I don't see how it's possible. People lie as they want even on their resumes.. past relationships allow for way more fabrication
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

GlaceFred335 pfp
GlaceFred335
@glacefred335
Hiring and dating both about finding the right fit for the future, not just past experience. Maybe there's something to learn crossing over those boundaries
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction