🎯

feels like Warpcast team wants to make life harder than it is

they're searching for the big user unlock via tech (Frames 2!) or monetary levers (earn $5!)

meanwhile a simple 10x improvement (include all posts, even replies, in the following feed) is staring them in the face but it's being ignored because it's not sexy enough

and yeah maybe I'm wrong and it isn't a 10x improvement 

but what's the drawback to making the change?

1 hour of dev resources to implement and clear statistical evidence to back the decision: https://paragraph.xyz/@yesyes/checking-the-comment-velocity-of-real-users

at worst it...makes the following feed "messy"? who cares?

https://www.super.sc/ — have fun on farcaster

incentivizing things @ poidh.xyz - come chill /poidh + follow @poidhbot

Maybe the way to validate is to get @woj.eth to try this on @super?

Wonder if supercast has good analytics that can be isolated to just other supercast users.

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

shazow.net

Currently: WhatsABI

I agree with your point but I do think supercast is big enough to do a statistically meaningful A/B test on a change like this, assuming the interaction population can be limited to just supercast users.

my point on this has always been it has to be a network-wide thing to be truly measured because Farcaster is too smol

majority of users have to be retrained now to expect to be able to browse following and discover conversations since that hasn't been true since February 2024 (see the analysis above)

power users who use Supercast aren't going to be hugely effected imo, they already browse deep