shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
How can open social protocols fail us? I put together an analysis comparing several specific failure modes between Farcaster, Bluesky, and Mastodon. Please let me know if any of the protocol descriptions could be presented more fairly! https://shazow.net/posts/open-social-2025/
8 replies
8 recasts
27 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
good article! my understanding here is that if the PLC decides to delete your DID keys you lose the ability to update your identity. there is some promise to decentralize it in the future, but it hasn't been executed yet. is this incorrect?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

xh3b4sd ↑ pfp
xh3b4sd ↑
@xh3b4sd.eth
I would be curious how you would describe it through the lense of gravitropic topologies. https://protocol-particles.github.io/Phenomena/Gravitropy/
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

androidsixteen pfp
androidsixteen
@androidsixteen.eth
Great read, small typo `shazow.bsky.socialf` What is your recommendation for people who are looking to invest / commit to an open social protocol -- which would you recommend (could be more than one), and where would you deploy resources to improve that protocol?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
this is really good
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
nice write up Is the PLC sovereign right now? I thought it was placeholder / controlled by the core team.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jay pfp
Jay
@jayhinz
anything on Nostr to add?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Moon pfp
Moon
@moon.eth
With regard to "can my identity be taken away on bluesky" a while back I tried to create a new identity using DID:Web instead of Placeholder, with my own self-hosted PDS. There was only one piece of software to let you do this, which was provided by BlueSky itself, and it still required me to still effectively "register" with their servers to be seen by the network. (The first time I tried it their tool didn't even work, it was a couple months before it worked again. ) Maybe it is not strictly necessary, or with a lot more work I could have figured it out, but as a practical matter you need them to get on the network. I am convinced that "decentralization" on Bluesky is not meant to be viable, it is meant to be a legal escape hatch in case Congress decided to regulate social media, which does seem to be the atmosphere Bluesky was conceived in at Twitter at the time. For what it's worth, nomadic identity for the Fediverse is actively being worked on, it even works on a few server implementations already.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

enfanty wowowo pfp
enfanty wowowo
@enfanty
Open social protocols can fail if not widely adopted or lacking adequate security measures
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction