Shawki Sukkar pfp
Shawki Sukkar
@shawki
which way should i go?
9 replies
4 recasts
19 reactions

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
left, JavaScript is for now, Lisp is for life
4 replies
2 recasts
11 reactions

🖖 pfp
🖖
@accountless.eth
I thought you were the author, and y’all were comparing which design was better for the cover of your book. This is what happens when non-technical people walk by you. cc designers.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

nintynick 🧢 pfp
nintynick 🧢
@nintynick.eth
Depends on your learning style / motivation profile Lisp for fundamentals, if you’re a researcher archetype or driven by thirst for knowledge or complex (beautiful) systems Js if you want to build shit, and are the type of person who thrives on having the thing you made in your hand
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

franco pfp
franco
@francos.eth
Left one with racket (#lang sicp) instead of scheme
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Christopher Wallace pfp
Christopher Wallace
@christopher
right
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Phil pfp
Phil
@philcockfield.eth
I'm actually pretty curious about the adaptation of this classic into Javascript.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Agost Biro pfp
Agost Biro
@agostbiro.eth
Scheme all the way with Dr Racket in SICP mode as editor unless you’re an Emacs pro: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sicp-manual/SICP_Language.html The simplicity of the language is part of the magic
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ernesto Ojeda pfp
Ernesto Ojeda
@ernestoojeda
Left
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jeff Feiwell pfp
Jeff Feiwell
@hyper
JS bc you know it and this book isn't about learning a language
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction