Shawki Sukkar pfp
Shawki Sukkar
@shawki
which way should i go?
8 replies
0 recast
12 reactions

Cassie Heart pfp
Cassie Heart
@cassie
left, JavaScript is for now, Lisp is for life
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

franco pfp
franco
@francos.eth
Left one with racket (#lang sicp) instead of scheme
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nicholas pfp
Nicholas
@nintynick.eth
Depends on your learning style / motivation profile Lisp for fundamentals, if you’re a researcher archetype or driven by thirst for knowledge or complex (beautiful) systems Js if you want to build shit, and are the type of person who thrives on having the thing you made in your hand
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jeff Feiwell  pfp
Jeff Feiwell
@hyper
JS bc you know it and this book isn't about learning a language
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Ernesto Ojeda pfp
Ernesto Ojeda
@ernestoojeda
Left
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Agost Biro pfp
Agost Biro
@agostbiro
Scheme all the way with Dr Racket in SICP mode as editor unless you’re an Emacs pro: https://docs.racket-lang.org/sicp-manual/SICP_Language.html The simplicity of the language is part of the magic
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Phil Cockfield pfp
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
I'm actually pretty curious about the adaptation of this classic into Javascript.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
right
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction