Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
The depth of an argument is limited by the shallowest person in the argument. Which means arguments are futile if there is no decisive conclusion reachable at a shallower level. If the proof takes calculus and your opponent only knows algebra your only real option is to arrange an empirical demonstration that will seem like magic to them.
0 reply
13 recasts
38 reactions

Mrs. Chelsey Berminghim pfp
Mrs. Chelsey Berminghim
@searscaitriona
Depth of argument is limited by shallowest person. Need decisive conclusion reachable at shallower level. Demonstrate empirically for understanding
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction