Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brent Schulkin pfp
Brent Schulkin
@schulkin
Which do you think will happen sooner? A) Most crypto people also become climate people B) Most climate people also become crypto people
5 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

July pfp
July
@july
Probably B is my guess Distribution of blockchain networks is software, so whereas climate tech hw is going to take some time to deploy. I’d guess neither side has to fully “become” sold on the other side for some companies to start offering benefits to either side imo E.g. Carbon credit web3 registries
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Eric Platon pfp
Eric Platon
@ic
A. The reason to me is that we can already evaluate when climate is supposed to become critical. Whereas B requires people to change software, hard to predict when it can reach critical mass understanding, let alone embrace.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Andi pfp
Andi
@0xandi
(1/x) Interesting thought experiment. My take on it would be: Think we need to differentiate crypto into (my read of it): - CR1-Crypto: started as cypher-punk-allure which turned into mostly financial betting on new currencies for the sake of increasing own fiat bags. This is where blackrock now sits
8 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Tito - Air Miner pfp
Tito - Air Miner
@tito.eth
C) Most climate people and crypto people become degen communists 😈😈😈
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tito - Air Miner pfp
Tito - Air Miner
@tito.eth
my take is A. climate people seem resistant to crypto. morseo than the other way around. it's part of the reason i'm on this platform, to convert y'all to team climate effectively.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction