Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sassal.eth 🎩⛽ pfp
Sassal.eth 🎩⛽
@sassal.eth
General thoughts on "liquidity fragmentation"
8 replies
14 recasts
108 reactions

jamesyoung.eth pfp
jamesyoung.eth
@jamesyoung
account abstraction -> chain abstraction -> liquidity abstraction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

tani ↑  pfp
tani ↑
@tanishq
“There exists no reality where everyone’s on one chain” Also true for centralized financial system
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Clouted pfp
Clouted
@clout
i wrote some expanded thoughts on this also if you want to read https://x.com/cloutedmind/status/1776788267792556261?s=46&t=JArLAONw_lAR-EfZH7-wDg
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ZΞYD 🎩 pfp
ZΞYD 🎩
@zeyd.eth
alpha. thanks for sharing 🫡
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Keanu Cage 🔵🎩🤘🏻 pfp
Keanu Cage 🔵🎩🤘🏻
@keanucage
I smoked a blunt with liquidity fragmentation once
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Snibb123.eth pfp
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
I would have pointed to Solana as a counter example until now. At this point, I’m starting to think you’re right.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

st4rgard3n.eth 🎩 pfp
st4rgard3n.eth 🎩
@st4rgard3n
Getting shared sequencers - or interoperable sequencers is a huge unlock for L2 space. I can visualize a way to make liquidity seamless between all ETH L2s. Imagine atomic transactions between two separate L2s. I think we will see that on the OP stack
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Top Tick Crypto🎩💩 pfp
Top Tick Crypto🎩💩
@toptickcrypto
200 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction