Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sassal.eth 🎩⛽
@sassal.eth
General thoughts on "liquidity fragmentation"
8 replies
11 recasts
82 reactions
tani
@tani.eth
“There exists no reality where everyone’s on one chain” Also true for centralized financial system
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
jamesyoung.eth
@jamesyoung
account abstraction -> chain abstraction -> liquidity abstraction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Snibb123.eth
@snibb123
I would have pointed to Solana as a counter example until now. At this point, I’m starting to think you’re right.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Keanu Cage 🔵🎩🤘🏻
@keanucage
I smoked a blunt with liquidity fragmentation once
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam
@samhayek
good cast man
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
clout
@clout
i wrote some expanded thoughts on this also if you want to read https://x.com/cloutedmind/status/1776788267792556261?s=46&t=JArLAONw_lAR-EfZH7-wDg
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Felipe Argento
@felipeargento
I hope soon we'll start to care less and less about TVL as a metric. Value locked is rarely good in a system. It is financially inefficient, creates the wrong kinds of incentives and adds friction to the entire thing. Plus, specially for optimistic rollups, it serves as an extra tool for anyone attacking the system!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
st4rgard3n.eth 🎩
@st4rgard3n
Getting shared sequencers - or interoperable sequencers is a huge unlock for L2 space. I can visualize a way to make liquidity seamless between all ETH L2s. Imagine atomic transactions between two separate L2s. I think we will see that on the OP stack
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
