Shower Thoughts

Has anyone in crypto world attempted to make a (better) alternative to Wikipedia? Given the editorial tilt of Wikipedia, this seems like such a big, meaningful project to take on. It's one that's also super difficult. Would require $ and a better plan on how to organize and sustain the editorial.

Building a new place to tell the future: prophecy.market - https://twitter.com/codybrown

A community notes built-in powered by token incentives to contribute, fact-check - correct.

Could be really good. I hope someone starts a meaningful narrative in this direction.

a decade+ of consumer products | farcaster godview: /intelligent | self exploration: /tanishq

From all the crypto experiences I’ve seen: token incentives to contribute are the death of quality.

But would be amazing to have a solution to this…

Getting /better
Crypto class of '17-FID 7012-⚔️ Web3 🖼️Art 🧑‍🎓 AI

🤝 Comm Collabs @gmoney.eth
🫂 ex-CM @justinaversano
💬 ex-CM @nftnow

this is my experience as well. there's an uncanny valley when it comes to getting quality. it's either free and open or centralized and paid. the middle tends to fail.

Maybe it needs middle-middle ground approach where contributors have a verifiable profile (through Farcaster).

Yes, but Farcaster profile aren’t enough indicative of quality - looking at the PB users at least…