salvino armati
@salvino
speaking purely from a capabilities point of view here but — blast seems extremely compelling to build on top of native yield + gas fee sharing combined expand the design space in very interesting ways
6 replies
33 recasts
81 reactions
Patrick | Megapot
@pl
That’s why we’re building /megapot on blast! If we have high TVL and many transactions, it just makes sense even if the short term sentiment is bad
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tani
@tanishq
yes but do they have volume? it felt like the momentum died pretty quickly
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
Their app can be super interesting to dig into
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wusong
@wusong123
VVv
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
aaronv
@aaronv.eth
is there a “but…”?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
advocadoburner 🎩
@advocadoburner
Blast is a pretty cool ecosystem from a user standpoint. The native yield is nice as well. One issue that may be relevant or not, is that bridging out of Blast is expensive relative to other chains, which may be a barrier for some users to migrate in order to use Blast DApps. Also their airdrop was kind of weak, according to some viewpoints, and then there was a resulting outflow of users. I’d have to check defi llama for stats on where they are at now to confirm though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction