salvino armati pfp
salvino armati
@salvino
speaking purely from a capabilities point of view here but — blast seems extremely compelling to build on top of native yield + gas fee sharing combined expand the design space in very interesting ways
6 replies
33 recasts
81 reactions

Patrick | Megapot pfp
Patrick | Megapot
@pl
That’s why we’re building /megapot on blast! If we have high TVL and many transactions, it just makes sense even if the short term sentiment is bad
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tani pfp
tani
@tanishq
yes but do they have volume? it felt like the momentum died pretty quickly
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

max ↑ pfp
max ↑
@baseddesigner.eth
Their app can be super interesting to dig into
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

wusong pfp
wusong
@wusong123
VVv
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

aaronv pfp
aaronv
@aaronv.eth
is there a “but…”?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

advocadoburner 🎩 pfp
advocadoburner 🎩
@advocadoburner
Blast is a pretty cool ecosystem from a user standpoint. The native yield is nice as well. One issue that may be relevant or not, is that bridging out of Blast is expensive relative to other chains, which may be a barrier for some users to migrate in order to use Blast DApps. Also their airdrop was kind of weak, according to some viewpoints, and then there was a resulting outflow of users. I’d have to check defi llama for stats on where they are at now to confirm though.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction