Saadiq

@saadiq

180 Following

504 Followers

Saadiq pfp

Fast fashion meets software: AI enables rapid, disposable apps tailored to niche needs. From workout timers to Chutes & Ladders spinners, bespoke solutions are now accessible to everyone. While true software engineering remains complex, AI empowers individuals to create artisanal apps for personal use. Expect a surge of niche tools improving everyday experiences. What have you built lately?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Fast fashion has come to software. I built a workout timer months back for 20 min body weight workouts while we were at an Airbnb this summer. This morning, I had Claude whip up a web app for a spinner to play Chutes & Ladders with my son. Disposable, bespoke apps for all.

0 reply

0 recast

5 reactions

Saadiq pfp

Everybody’s doing it. https://www.threads.net/@takebackflorida/post/DCpjl6GyWqd?xmt=AQGzK8LfC3ad7mVMwuUlaY9ZCbNb6wfVJQ-HQrWG4YNopg

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Agree. You will be far more successful at both if you can also do the task you are asking to be done. This thing will do exactly what you ask for but perhaps not what you want. You have to be able to know good work when you see it and nudge it back on track if it strays.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

AI isn't killing product management - it's eliminating the busywork. While document creation becomes trivial, the strategic work of connecting today's activities to customers' desired future becomes more crucial than ever. This "death" might just birth something better. https://paragraph.xyz/@saadiq/product-management-is-dead

2 replies

4 recasts

18 reactions

Saadiq pfp

This encapsulates why it’s so hard to build in crypto. Zeneca is at least in touch with what he truly wants. Most people really think they are into the art, the innovation, the decentralization, etc but they just chase what’s pumping.

2 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

Saadiq pfp

Could you finish the thought?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Disagree. Companies raise prices as much as they can independent of their tax situation. The constraint on them is if they have pricing power in their space. A tax on their inputs is a more direct contributor to raised prices because it would affect all players evenly. A tariff, for instance. Corp tax rate only affects their profits, right. So I think less direct contribution to prices.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

The other challenge is that while that’s true, most are also fooling themselves about it. They think they are here for the art or the community or the whatever… And they give feedback and complain along that narrative… Complaints oddly silent when number is going up and ever present on the down.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

So, if I understand it, you're saying the fact that it is so rare isn't the point. The fact that it could ever happen even once is the point. Is that correct? Ok, sure. Far be it from me to tell someone else what they should worry about. However, frequently the solutions to this "problem" cause more harm than the actual "problem". We haven't gotten there in this conversation but anti-voter fraud policies disenfranchise orders of magnitude more voters than there have ever been cases of voter fraud. That's a thing I find horrifying.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Saadiq pfp

Left: A toss-up. We’re hoping our VP, a former DA and congressperson, pulls through, but it’s beyond our control. Right: This is ours. If our sexual assault perpetrator, Nazi-endorsed ex-president with multiple convictions loses, we’ll burn this country down.

3 replies

0 recast

5 reactions

Saadiq pfp

Terrifying why? Voter fraud is EXTREMELY rare. It’s interesting how bad we are as humans at judging risk. Most of us are terrified of sharks because those big teeth could saw through us (10 fatalities a year globally.) However we think nothing of jumping in our car every day (over 40k deaths / yr in the US). But still, imagine! 🤷🏽‍♂️

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Underrated comment. 😂

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Saadiq pfp

No group is a monolith but it speaks to such a different world view that someone organizing thought this was a good move. I heard they had the content on the prompter. Somebody knew what was going to be said. Just wow. In a different age, this would be campaign ending if not also career ending.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Lucky you. I will continue to panic donate until morale improves.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Y’all are really going to make me fire this vpn up for this coin flip?! Ugh!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Ah. Ok. I think the point is that Trump doesn't deserve the credit, not that Obama deserves credit. 1. Congress is responsible for checks. 2. Checks went out during other presidencies. 3. Nobody else was so narcissistic as to try and put their own name on it. As written.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

How are you interpreting it? Here is ChatGPT's interpretation: https://chatgpt.com/share/6720db16-9a24-8013-9721-589da2fb255b The distinction made here is about which branch of government has the authority over federal spending. Stimulus payments during the pandemic were authorized and funded by Congress, which has the constitutional power over budget decisions. When people say “Trump sent a check” or “Biden sent a check,” it’s shorthand for these presidents signing into law the relief bills passed by Congress. While presidents sign legislation to make it official, the actual authority to allocate and approve spending rests with Congress, not the president. The writer is emphasizing that these checks were the result of legislative action rather than executive initiative, and they note that neither they nor Biden branded the checks with their names, contrasting with how Trump had his name added to the checks.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Are you saying that Harris caused inflation? For context, there’s a global inflation problem coming out of the pandemic. The US has handled it the best having the lowest rate. Which doesn’t mean things aren’t expensive but it does seem to mean our govt has managed it relatively well. So she may be saying more of that.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Saadiq pfp

Social media length constraints don’t help here. I’d read that as clarifying a President doesn’t send the checks. But if you want to attribute checks to Presidents, attribute all the checks to Presidents including Biden’s. It’s the “Joe Biden ALSO sent a check…” Are you interpreting it differently?

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions