Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rphgrc.base.eth β†‘πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ˜Ί pfp
rphgrc.base.eth β†‘πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ˜Ί
@rphgrc.eth
I kind of agree with Anton's perspective https://antongolub.substack.com/p/tokenization-of-real-world-assets mostly for the liquidity part: supply of RWA ok, but I dont see the demand matching
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

rphgrc.base.eth β†‘πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ˜Ί pfp
rphgrc.base.eth β†‘πŸ”΅πŸŽ©πŸ˜Ί
@rphgrc.eth
(on secondary)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Niles pfp
Niles
@pointsguy
I agree - SPVs don’t scale and secondary market on-chain trades are unusable for everyday users. imo the only RWAs that could be easily issued on-chain in the short term are loyalty points. They could drive widespread on-chain adoption, convincing institutions to progressively tokenize their assets.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tokenDaddy pfp
tokenDaddy
@tokendaddy
I don’t disagree with any of the points in general. However, generalizing such a heterogeneous space is a mistake. Yes, of course, it’s not scalable to spin up many small customized SPVs. There are very large pools of assets like Alts though where you can solve real UX problems w blockchain tech.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dfi pfp
dfi
@dfi
I largely agree with Anton’s general thesisβ€”that we need regulatory frameworks to make all RWAs better and more secure than traditional finance. However, there already exist killer apps... Stablecoins are RWA brought on chain. As are the newly emerging yield-bearing stables.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction