rish

Neynar

if using Neynar managed signers (separate from SIWN) to create signers under your brand, you can now *sponsor* those signers

Users will see signers under your brand, but you pay for them instead of the user

h/t @shreyas-chorge, @avneesh 🪐

PS - no changes to SIWN as part of this, reach out if qs

bit.ly/4czybHi

new on supercast: sponsored signer approvals

why?
- you need an onchain transaction to allow supercast to post on your behalf
- the price of this used to be ~100 warps before eip-4844 or $1 if you have no warps or up to $4 during the gas spikes!
- some users like @joobid.eth spent outrageous sums on supercast signers — he alone is probably on $20+ in total spend)
- after eip-4844 approving a signer costs 10 warps
- and now supercast is able to pay for all approvals so all the user sees is “connect”

it’s honestly one my most awaited updates and i’m glad it finally works this way

this is how we scale crypto ux

- signers under your brand on the protocol
- paid by a sponsoring account of your choice (instead of user)
- managed and abstracted by neynar

- signers under your brand on the protocol
- paid by a sponsoring account of your choice (instead of user)
- managed and abstracted by neynar

https://warpcast.com/woj.eth/0x6a678144

working @ /neynar   🪐  casting @ /rish

You mean sponsoring with Warps ?
Why would an app choose this method vs SIWN ?
Currently we have SIWN and wallet signers (that we sponsor).
The only downside I see with SIWN is that it is shared with other apps, is there any other ?

building /anser https://anser.social | prev. Ledger

You get to build your own UI + anyone reading the protocol sees the signer under your name vs Neynar