Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
4 recasts
4 reactions

rish pfp
rish
@rish
reminder if building on FC protocol - client -> protocol has a time gap - an action on WC shows up on WC immediately but during times of heavy load, can take up to mins to appear on the protocol (this is expected and WC is usually pretty good) worth keeping in mind when building frames that rely on quick actions
6 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

rish pfp
rish
@rish
live example of this happening right now where data is appearing on the network in short bursts instead of in real time
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction

David Furlong (hiring devs) pfp
David Furlong (hiring devs)
@df
solution: use a non WC client to post Frames?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Manuel pfp
Manuel
@manuelmaccou.eth
Does this affect the ability for users to mint NFTs in the frame?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

bashobits šŸš…āœØšŸ”µā†‘ pfp
bashobits šŸš…āœØšŸ”µā†‘
@bashobits
thank you šŸ«”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

juxton pfp
juxton
@juxton.eth
This would explain what Iā€™m seeing in the UI/UX. After recast I have to wait a few minutes for the corresponding mint to work
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kenanie.degen.eth pfp
kenanie.degen.eth
@kenanie.eth
I think this is the answer to a question I had. So basically, the reason why some actions don't work is because the server hasn't processed the command yet, or rather, hasn't received the command yet.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction