maybe a dumb question, but why is it that clanker tokens generally have more liquidity/ higher market caps than zora tokens?

is it just the visibility of deploying via social?

zora is yet to set a precedent with a coin that holds liquidity; clanker has already done that job well with so many launches

good things take time—frictionless experiences—product × strat × ops

i've noticed that, yeah. so it's based on a perceived value in the larger ecosystem? 

because on paper they're all erc20s on base

is there a concrete benefit to an erc20 having been deployed via clanker vs zora once it's out in the world?

/clanker | @ me if you need anything, don't dm

this is what i'm trying to better understand. why is clanker better at distribution? zora's got a platform dedicated to discovery, so if i didn't know better i'd guess their distribution would be decent too.

clanker gets you the kind of distribution any other platform isn't even close to

+ clanker has managed to earn the trust and reputation fairly well, props to @proxystudio.eth, @dish

++ platforms (re bankr, clankfun, checkr, to name a few) built on top of clanker have also managed to add value to the clanker ecosystem and continue to do so

i have experienced this first hand with the launch of $SHIFT — it has done $2.5mn+ in volume and i don't think it would have been possible without clanker