Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ripe↑ pfp
ripe↑
@ripe
what needs to happen to improve liquidity for higher? this is a relatively small swap, but still getting a high impact this seems like a blocker for network growth i know it's prevented me from bidding more at certain times
7 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
This is where I have thought when looking to burn higher why not just have things in the eco that when they are used more higher is added to LP. Not saying your recent burn was a bad move but just a thought. Also how is the amount of LP vs like say current clankers that are deployed?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

ripe↑ pfp
ripe↑
@ripe
is more higher in the lp the solution?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
I would assume so. There is a platform on Algorand that not only shows like the top 100 holders but also what % they hold is in LP. I have a feeling there are many strong believers in $higher but many don’t want to deal with impermanent loss if/when it takes off. Also considering that the fees earned from current trading might not offset the IL
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑ pfp
CRYPTOforCHANGE ↑
@cryptoforchange
But also I think it would help if there were people who solely focused on the $higher token and its growth. Currently it seems like it has a backseat among the bigger names building in higher.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

SAINTLESS pfp
SAINTLESS
@saintless.eth
no
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions