Sam Iglesias
@sam
I’m curious, for those interested in Neuralink type things: why do people assume that the brain can generate thoughts and intentions faster than speech? Speech: 125-150 WPM Typing: 65-75 WPM Wouldn’t we have evolved some level of parity whereby we more or less think in language at roughly the rate of speech?
18 replies
2 recasts
12 reactions
rhys
@rhys
Interesting (Also interested in who assumes this) What would be the quickest way to communicate a spatial reasoning problem to solve? Words, to be read; or symbols? And while that wasn’t your question; does make me curious about how that idea is formed in the mind — word after word (linear), or an image snapshot
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sam Iglesias
@sam
This is a great point. It’s hard to say, because it’s possible to draw a picture that’s ambiguous but to describe the same picture is somehow less ambiguous (imagine being unable to draw a t-rex well)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction