Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

co founder of @metamask . Making computers behave for us.

Not taking any sides here just trying to make sure we're all secure. Some useful info I just validated myself:

If you ADD a message (hub speak for casting) using signer A
and then DELETE a message using signer B

all the signing tools, hub message APIs, etc. will say signer A doesn't have any recent activity because the message returned by the hub is overwritten to say signer B is affiliated with the message. Because it was the last one to interact with it (delete). 

If someone (most likely MM team @dwr.eth @v) has logs of hub events then we'll know which signer sent the cast from @danfinlay's account this am. 

Until then we can't be sure that it was the Warpcast signer. We also can't be sure that any of the other signers are off the hook. All we know is the Warpcast signer deleted the message (probably after Dan logged on).

Creator of @harmonybot @yoinker /bot-or-not | /blitkin | /orange-dao | IRL: Building spatial computing for construction @ Resolve YC W15

Thanks for sharing this insight. It's crucial to thoroughly verify signer activities to maintain transparency and security for all involved parties.