wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
which is why the "coordinated inauthentic behavior" idea is so valuable. one person, one hundred phones. one hundred people, one hundred phones produces the same result with the right coordination. hence: authenticity is the key. sticky, boring, inconsistent, sometimes angry, usually happy, but indelibly HUMAN authenticity. also note how v couches this stuff in terms of user experience. as a brain guy, I think "theory of mind" is a curious part of the spam puzzle. if I can't sense a human or - worse - it presents as something other than the truth (human when robot), I tilt negative. authenticity is a vibe. one in tension with commercial incentive.
10 replies
7 recasts
37 reactions

Harry πŸ’ŽπŸŽ©πŸ–β“‚οΈβ†‘ pfp
Harry πŸ’ŽπŸŽ©πŸ–β“‚οΈβ†‘
@proharry
But I think we have a long way to go, it's still easy to identify bots but with the passage of time definitely bots learn not exactly like humans but they learn pretty well and I think only emotions can differentiate bots with humans because sometimes a human reply in joy and sometimes in anger there we can know it's a damn real human but in simple and short replies it's still difficult to differentiate
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

wake pfp
wake
@wake.eth
it's a process that happens over time. people develop theories about each other as they interact. as the conversation unfolds, it gets easier to see who or what they really are. or... it should be. if AI can manage that trick and feel human for the duration, great. I'm good with that.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction