Formerly @preach.































































Building @LEAK — Your new age jukebox. 















WIP: https://leaked.app 

> hey couldn’t care less about the business aspect of this protocol at all despite it being the only thing that matters

I don't understand -- care to expand?

You need money to keep this protocol alive. You can’t make money if you prioritize quality of community and not the size of ecosystem. Right now there seems to be a general theme of building for the sake of calling yourself a builder when it should be about building for the sake of the business.

I'm sensing this conversation might not be productive, but in the spirit of assuming good faith:

- Invite only approach has been useful for keeping quality high and avoiding a whole host of problems that happens when a community grows too fast

- Protocol is prioritizing getting to 100% permissionless

- Protocol will have native monetization built in once we're on mainnet

- From a metrics standpoint, we're quite focused on retained daily active users

.@corporatefilth.eth if you were in charge of the protocol tomorrow, what would you do differently?

Maker of Airstack: The easiest way to build on Farcaster. Frames SDK. Frames APIs. No-code Frames. Onchain Composability APIs | airstack.xyz | hihi! 


prev american energy data and cofounded rocketr.net swish.id 

I also dm’d about this, a @betashop.eth suggestion