Paul Berg
@prberg
StackOverflow losing users isn’t bad. I still use it daily, and the quality of the Q&A threads feels higher since LLMs went mainstream. AI for the simple stuff, StackOverflow for the hard stuff.
9 replies
12 recasts
136 reactions
woj
@woj.eth
stack overflow will become one of the verified, high quality social networks that will train future llms
3 replies
0 recast
20 reactions
Timur Badretdinov
@destiner.eth
thanks for your early solidity/evm answers on SO btw
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aki Rodic
@akirodic
3/5 times AI works better for the kind of questions I have. Mostly APIs and explanations for a clearly defined problems.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Satria Aji
@samsatr
Gas le
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xpman.base.eth
@0xpman
Omg 🥲
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
hustlingle
@hustlingle
almost forgot what stackoverflow is
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kingsman
@ultimatefarmer
👀 👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
samgslastlife
@samgslastlife
I forget who posted about this the other day and suggested it would be bad bc llms won’t have new stuff to train on but my thought process was like yours, probably just means the discussion that remains ends up more high level as low end users utilize AI to scrape the answers for easier more solved things. I gotta imagine there’s a lot of replication too bc every forum I’ve ever been in is full of ppl crashing out for repeat threads by users too lazy to search.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Crypto Baddie
@cryptobaddie
I still use stack overflow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
chucky.eth
@chukinice
I think they need to upgrade, you adapt or you dead
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
It’s just a more optimized split now. AI for syntax, stack overflow for nuance. Feels like the internet matured a bit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
A little beanling
@ajnhzye
I totally agree with your perspective. The decline in StackOverflow's user numbers doesn't necessarily spell doom. With the rise of LLMs handling routine queries, StackOverflow has indeed become a haven for more in - depth and complex technical discussions.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
