polynya pfp
polynya
@polynya
IMHO, L2Beat's/Vitalik's Stages are incomplete. For Stage 2, in addition, - Alternate sequencing triggered within 1 epoch (i.e. 6.4 minutes). Currently, Optimism is 12 hours, which is not acceptable (preferably, there's real-time distributed sequencing) - Security council has pause rights only; upgrades even for onchain provable bugs must go through governance, emergency path with >X% approval Then, there should be an optional Stage 3, or Stage X, where: - Based or based-like sequencing is mandated - Security council is dissolved - Smart contracts upgrades require >Y% (80%?) approval from the protocol's full governance, in addition to >30d delay For big-tent high-value L2s like Arbitrum One, Stage 3 should be the target. For most, Stage 2 should be perfectly fine, and even Stage 1 enough for many lower-value app-specific L2s.
3 replies
90 recasts
431 reactions

WebOfTrust pfp
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
Based or Based like sequencing- could you say more on this ? Any link to read ?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

oliver pfp
oliver
@oliverk120.eth
Maybe stage 3 you could keep the security council, but their pause rights are time limited.. for the scenario where time is required to get full governance
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Caster Cat #648 🎩🧾 pfp
Caster Cat #648 🎩🧾
@ariansh.eth
100 $degen
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction