Phil Cockfield
@pjc
ð¯âð» â ð (Q)
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
â @cassie, if this is true, then it would make sense to do the `cross-mint` so as to participate in the bridge back into Quilibirium of the rewards. Just to be on the historical record of having "been there, done that" right? ...as opposed to just waiting on the QUIL for v2? Any downside? Seems like learning upside
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
There's a number of reasons folks have expressed for their want to use it. Historical record, consolidation, or having a transactable token (as they're frozen on the Q side until 2.0). No downside, learning upside, but Q Inc explicitly will not bridge any tokens rewarded to its own infrastructure peers.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
"Q Inc" is a damn cool company name! Thanks @cassie
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
That's just the shorthand, the full name is Quilibrium Inc
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
