Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Warpcast *is* the app. There aren’t going to be lots of popular interfaces. Power laws still apply. All the important engagement mechanics happen in the UI.
17 replies
11 recasts
40 reactions

nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
The permissionless Farcaster API will be useful for specialized applications, but there won’t be more than a handful of relevant general purpose frontends and Warpcast will be the biggest.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
There is no “client opportunity” because (in 99.9% of cases) ain’t nobody building a habit around your 10% UI deviation from warpcast and you don’t have the stamina to build that habit either.
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
agree. i built client in the past, some observation: - when people say "check out my FC account," they link their warpcast.com/profile link, not other client link (even though other clients can display profile well) - non-Warpcast clients of ~2 quarters ago (Phrasetown, Discove, Jam) "faded" in favor of Warpcast
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
- vanilla (non-differentiated) client can't compete with Warpcast, some notable differentiated clients: Unlonely, Blobs. "Warpcast but different UI" is not different enough - Searchcaster has been around since the beginning, lindy, very valuable project - if you think of Warpcast as a platform, bots are apps
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction