Tarun Chitra pfp
Tarun Chitra
@pinged
Every year, I feel like I understand less and less about randomness (a sort of inverse of the second law of thermodynamics 😅) Some of the consequences of how things are subtly non-random due to Szemerédi’s regularity lemma are 🤯🤯🤯
11 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Tarun Chitra pfp
Tarun Chitra
@pinged
This was something I wanted to post on Twitter, but thought it was too niche 😜
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joey Roth | Dyad pfp
Joey Roth | Dyad
@joeyroth
everything is deterministic if you zoom out far enough
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Aman Dhesi pfp
Aman Dhesi
@aman
Along these lines, I always thought the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma was fascinating (any two random high-dimensional vectors are highly likely to be orthogonal)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
hersh pfp
hersh
@hersh
You think there are inherent patterns in randomness if you zoom out on a large scale?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Adam Baybutt pfp
Adam Baybutt
@baybutt
Uhhhh, wen breakdown? Down for 🤯 re the lemma. DYOR def appropriate!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
wake 🎩 pfp
wake 🎩
@wake.eth
I had a very serious stoner moment about randomness the other day and it paralyzed me for two hours. Serious shit.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Toni Thai Sterrett pfp
Toni Thai Sterrett
@tonithai
Did you just call me dumb? Because this cast went over my head. 😱 (& welcome)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mycelia pfp
mycelia
@mycelia
I’m not going to try and understand this proof on my phone, but the implication is that seemingly random subgraphs can come from one unified one? How have you seen this generalized in other areas?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sanjeed pfp
sanjeed
@sanjeed
@perl Google this later
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yashish - Lucidly Finance pfp
Yashish - Lucidly Finance
@0x
Glad to see you here bud.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xhambone pfp
0xhambone
@hambone
Welcome to the purple app fam👏🫡
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction