Catch0x22 pfp
Catch0x22
@catch0x22
i genuinely give fc about a month in on solana socialfi getting pushed, and no one will remember warpcast fc will continue to grow but mindshare is a very fickle mistress solana already has socialfi just no killer app. few
11 replies
0 recast
21 reactions

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
https://warpcast.com/itsbasil/0x78f3a5af new socialfi on solana? what about x coming out saying they’ll build financial tx into the timeline & accept btc, doge, and xrp by yearend what about lens raising 30m - will they use that for ua? what about the below
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
UA without retention is worthless
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

basil pfp
basil
@itsbasil
naturally buy shouldn't be from lack of trying & now is a good time given regulatory clarity, base run, clanker attention & frames momentum. we can't take good timing for granted. it wont last forever. we also cant let fc eco fade relative to the most bullish base backdrop we'll likely ever see. bad for devs choosing to build here. slowly throttled is fine but what else can the platform do if these cannot improve retention? fc is materialized. now we must hold meta. plus retention must be taken in the eye of the crypto native. in such case, there are more ways to "buy" users than ua as we're discussing here. namely through the nurturing of an ecosystem, expanding access to capital/optics for devs, and/or matching x creator rewards. at this point, especially if the goal is to attract all of crypto first & foremost, it should be considered that retention is inherently rooted in ecosystem appreciation https://warpcast.com/itsbasil/0xe7314d9e https://warpcast.com/itsbasil/0x4eeecd78
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
While I appreciate you sharing suggestions, when talking to devs, funding is the not primary issue. It’s growing retained users. We have yet to have an ecosystem app drive growth. Ecosystem assets have driven growth, but they don’t need grants.
3 replies
0 recast
16 reactions

patxol đź”· anser.social pfp
patxol đź”· anser.social
@patxol.eth
Retaining devs in the ecosystem should also be a priority. Since a couple of month we've see a lot of Farcaster OG devs abandon their project (no funding and not enough revenu) and move away from building for Farcaster. This should be a concern, unless you plan on massively hiring for Merkle to build a solid ecosystem of apps around Farcaster and Warpcast. You can't expect retention if there is nothing interesting built around Farcaster, and most of the funds to build this ecosystem are already in Merkle's hands.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It’s a primary concern. The consistent top priority for Farcaster developers is grow retained daily active users.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

patxol đź”· anser.social pfp
patxol đź”· anser.social
@patxol.eth
Growing retained DAU is indeed the top priority, as this is one of the key concerns for investors, and the key drivers for revenue (except for memecoin / trading where volume is not necessarily linked to users). Unfortunately DAU has kept decreasing since July, and projects have been closing one after the other, because devs need funding too, unless it's a side project for fun.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction