Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
18 recasts
21 reactions

0xie pfp
0xie
@0xieacc.eth
We should be siding with HL right?
3 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

ArunReddy pfp
ArunReddy
@arunreddy
Perhaps the best step they could have taken is to draft up all the possible scenarios after last incident and made possible changes instead of taking the bait today and having to rollback a trade to their favourable number. Probably business takes a hit for short term but the reputation for taking a centralized decision while claiming to be 100% decentralized isnโ€™t gonna be appreciated by the community. Anyway, I assume everyone will forget this once a new news pops up lol Hyper liquid ๐Ÿ‘ป
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

NutellaCrepe ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ– pfp
NutellaCrepe ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ–
@nutellacrepe.eth
That was tough ๐Ÿ˜ฃ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ArunReddy pfp
ArunReddy
@arunreddy
But @zachxbt pointed out something really interesting. HL didnโ€™t draw a line to block wallets that were funded from Radiant hack but chose to do it today when they are about to take a hit. Not sure if Jeff would have an answer to this lol
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction