matthewb.eth
@matthewb
sincerely hope the MM team doesn’t give up their rigorous security practices (specifically re: dependencies) while pursuing this redesign. no other wallet comes close. also, lowkey their current UI/UX is fine. it always works reliably, which is more than I can say for most of the other options currently available.
1 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
Hoot 🎩
@owl
They definitely need a UX refresh. Metamask always felt clunky and “nerdy” they need to make it more sleek. It’s literally the first impression almost every new web3 user gets
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
it’s totally fine since they added aggregated token balances from popular networks, everything visible in one place. overall more clunky than rainbow, for sure, but it also works 100% of the time. rabby I like for their transaction simulation and whitelist features but imo the UI is cluttered and it’s quite clunky as well.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
