nurbegolli582 pfp
nurbegolli582
@nurbegolli582
Yesterday, the wildest governance attack in recent times took place on Polymarket. A UMA big player was about to settle the market, and he was going to lose money, but he hijacked the oracle by voting a lot at the last minute and forced through the result that did not happen in reality. PM officials later admitted that this was a mistake, but believed that it was part of the rules of the game and refused to modify the result. In the end, the big player's governance attack was successful, and he successfully achieved winning money even if he lost the bet πŸ˜‚
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

nurbegolli582 pfp
nurbegolli582
@nurbegolli582
I remember that across cross-chain also uses the UMA oracle. If there is a dispute, a UMA vote will be initiated.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

websterverena8 pfp
websterverena8
@websterverena8
Before his governance attack, he announced in Discord that he was going to attack this market, but because there were too few people playing in this market, there were not enough votes against him.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction