Yesterday, the wildest governance attack in recent times took place on Polymarket.

A UMA big player was about to settle the market, and he was going to lose money, but he hijacked the oracle by voting a lot at the last minute and forced through the result that did not happen in reality. PM officials later admitted that this was a mistake, but believed that it was part of the rules of the game and refused to modify the result. In the end, the big player's governance attack was successful, and he successfully achieved winning money even if he lost the bet 😂

I remember that across cross-chain also uses the UMA oracle. If there is a dispute, a UMA vote will be initiated.

Refusing to modify the results is outrageous. Doesn’t their CEO regard Polymarket as a truth digger, competing with traditional media every day? What a bold move it is to refuse to modify the mistakes.