Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
seems like the fork threshold raising prop isn't passing anyways but i'm curious to understand the sentiment of the original proposal. is the idea that a fork is imminent and we need to stop it? if we think arbitrageurs accumulated close to 30% of the supply then i'd rather consider lowering the threshold
2 replies
3 recasts
30 reactions

Noun 40 pfp
Noun 40
@noun40
the intent behind raising the fork threshold from 10% to 30% (nouns.camp/proposals/439) was to *deter* arbers. if the accumulation continued despite that then rather than trap them i would rather open the door to make it easier for them to leave.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Wilson Cusack pfp
Wilson Cusack
@wilsoncusack
I feel p sad that we’ve just accepted this as a thing. It’s not helping right to exit at all at this point. We need to be more pragmatic.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction