Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Noun 40
@noun40
very excited for this direction. after 3 years of nouns governance a thing i feel strongly is that majority voting (while still the best thing we have for large lump sum decisions) doesn’t work well for smaller scale non consensus ideas and tends to feel opaque to newcomers if we want more free competition of ideas at smaller iterative scales then these types of funding mechanisms where majority consensus isn’t needed to get started but then gradually get more and more funding come your way as consensus is built and the idea out competes others is a great direction it will also reveal in more real time and non majority dominated way what nouners think are worth funding (is it more esports? more animation? plushies?). there could also be some buyer attribution based on what a new nouner immediately chooses to stream to. just a lot of potential for nouns funding to become more well rounded, more legible, and more fun (majority voting governance drama is fun to sum but not all). excited!
2 replies
4 recasts
88 reactions
rocketman
@rocketman
wrote more about the incentives of the system here https://mirror.xyz/rocketman21.eth/zTom-t4DzYjSRXnjx7o1jS6TEwzoR0kFYGdEE3fPJok curious if you have any thoughts on how to do TCR token issuance / supply
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dara Khan
@spookyaction-btc
Agree there is a big opp for what I think used to be called medium grants in the past. I.e. too big for Rounds, too small to go through the process of a full vote. Eager to see a more flexible, modular, easy-to-update form of Prophouse that meets the DAOs needs and makes medium-size grant funding easier.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
