not sure how to say this, but how have dogs been at the top of the leaderboard (multiple times) and i’ve never once seen a nigerian caster break the top 10 despite having a lot of content and a lot of engagement? 

can someone make it make sense? 

gonna recast @afrochicks post in the thread below because it was on point 👇

Smaller accounts often struggle to get reach; not because their content isn’t good, but because who sees you matters a lot.
The system rewards engagement, and when organic discovery doesn’t work, it’s natural for people to find ways to push themselves up.
Everyone’s trying to win, it’s not a crime to want visibility.

The bigger accounts aren’t doing anything wrong by engaging with who and what they want. But for smaller accounts, when they try to grow and get reprimanded. it feels like a system that favors some and leaves others out.

A better solution would be building a smarter review process:
Instead of manually labeling, there should be an automated, fair system to detect real spam vs cultural communication differences.
And if flagged, users should have a transparent way to appeal and get proper feedback.

Growth should be fair and accessible not based on who’s lucky enough to be noticed.