Wynn/跳 pfp

Wynn/跳

@notthere

34 Following
4 Followers


ETHGlobal pfp
ETHGlobal
@ethglobal
AI should not replace human intent in DAOs—it should amplify it DAOs struggle with noise and low-quality decisions that AI can help filter. But the challenge is not to replace humans—it's to design AI DAOs that scale coordination while preserving intent. The future of DAOs isn’t autonomy for its own sake, but smarter tools that help communities govern better, together With @vitalik.eth, @shawmakesmagic, @owocki, @nkenneth, @linda, and Tina Zhen
1 reply
32 recasts
76 reactions

Trent pfp
Trent
@trent
read this recently and enjoyed. where does power pool in the Ethereum political economy? "Chromium as a tool of logistical power: A material political economy of open-source" https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/20539517231182399
0 reply
27 recasts
50 reactions

Martin  pfp
Martin
@koeppelmann.eth
Getting close to hopefully something big...
17 replies
58 recasts
282 reactions

Austin Griffith pfp
Austin Griffith
@austingriffith
TIL walletbeat.fyi thx @polymutex.eth
1 reply
2 recasts
16 reactions

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
Thanks for the Chinese translation of *Possible Futures of Ethereum Protocol* by @lxdao, ethpanda, and all the contributors. Because of the generosity of LXDAO, Nantang received many copies of this work.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
But it's bascially say that crypto is and will be a financial layer. There are also people owning something in internet before, for example silicon elites. And the same thinh for crypto, most assets belong to a small amount of people. Every one "owns" some money, but some owns much more. Crypto is not about "own" something, it's more about fair distribution.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
我觉得我成了一个咖啡壶
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Mathematicians have a really annoying tendency to use the word "elliptic" to refer to things that have only a tenuous connection with ellipses.
76 replies
527 recasts
2406 reactions

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
In Ethereum’s minimalistic design, economics is at the core. But it’s not seen as the goal, it’s should marks the beginning of Ethereum’s potential and our imagination of Ethereum.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
And the conclusion is that in Ethereum protocol, economics is a powerful tool to defend this human-computer collective, or system. But it’s not meant to be a powerful tool to extract value from this system.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
This is interesting since I want to take algorithm here as machine like thing, which here I see machine as a set of mathematical rules, and incentives here as mathematical assumptions of human nature, which is also machine like nature of human beings.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
I am reading Vitalik’s “Credible Neutrality As A Guiding Principle”, and this sentence “essentially, a mechanism is an algorithm plus incentives” caught my eye.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Wynn/跳 pfp
Wynn/跳
@notthere
My thoughts today is that economics is essential to Ethereum protocol because it’s used as a powerful tool to defend the value that Ethereum built upon: decentralization. But it’s by no means the end of our imagination on Ethereum. (Thread)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction