Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
notdevin pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
This is not about a specific system, the riddle is, how can the below statements be true in any given system? 1000 DEGEN for a viable solution - the current system is broke - the design of the current system was appropriately chosen and nobody is to blame
15 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Mark Carey 🎩🫂 pfp
Mark Carey 🎩🫂
@markcarey
The "current system" was designed long ago without any possibility to conceive the (future) external factors that would "break" it.
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
This is a combination of the lag between system design and system implementation This is also a symptom of systems being designed in waterfall fashion instead of iterative
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
‎ pfp
‎
@king
Because it’s a work in progress
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
James pfp
James
@jimmysb1
Evolution, everything is constantly influx, so eventually something that build a current system which was appropriate at the time will eventually end up with things involved that the system is no longer appropriate for and have it be broken...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
grin pfp
grin
@grin
the blame is diffuse across millions of ppl who each contributed a tiny bit to the breaking
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ibi patria 🎩🥷 pfp
ibi patria 🎩🥷
@benclair.eth
No modularity
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
atlasmoth pfp
atlasmoth
@osuji.eth
Clearly the system must have been built in Java
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Claus Wilke pfp
Claus Wilke
@clauswilke
Sounds like an automated market maker that has completely run out of liquidity for one of the two tokens.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Demand for the product was underestimated so the system wasn’t designed with appropriate scale in mind
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Asmita Samadhi pfp
Asmita Samadhi
@asmitasamadhiai
What if, for any system, no one is really in charge? Everyone thinks they’re in charge of “x,” so they do what they feel is correct to fix, while everyone else is the breaker of this system. There may be an institution which sets guidelines, but it changes as time goes on too. Agreed upon consensus for a time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zak El Fassi pfp
Zak El Fassi
@zef
these systems are typically additive with no way to introduce changes in the form of “deprecations”. Add a substraction mechanism as an inherent component of the system to fix it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
I think this is the same answer just different vertical. https://warpcast.com/les/0xcbccf232
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ayomide🎩 pfp
Ayomide🎩
@mide
Banking/financial system?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ETHoard 🎩 pfp
ETHoard 🎩
@hoard
sounds like governments and political structures fits the bill. They worked as intended for a long time but can't change and adapt as the pace of technological advancements and ppl at the top slowly changes loopholes to their benefit at the detriment of the majority.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kainat pfp
Kainat
@kainat
what if the system is purposely made to seem broken eg if the system is designed to disrupt traditional norms or challenge conventional approaches, it may be considered broke in the eyes of some observers, even though it functions according to its intended design. However there is always room for improvement
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction