Just a reminder that a great spam mitigation mechanism is the sender stakes the message, and the recipient has the option to slash and delete the stake 

Will repeat every time I get a spam message

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

.@açaí points out that ppl could maliciously slash the send stake

How much of a potential problem is this?

.@açaí points out that ppl could maliciously slash the send stake

How much of a potential problem is this?

https://warpcast.com/acai/0x72f28e6c

Feels like something that could easily be solved with some sort of appeal + reputation system, can also add in some dynamic staking to account for senders reputation and their distance within the recipients social graph!