retroactive grants are cool but they require builders take on all the risk (build it and you *might* get *some* funding)

an alternative ✨proactive✨ approach:

the way to solve this is with investment in builders where the investor gets a fraction of the retrofunding

The only problem is externality pricing.

Building https://negationgame.com

ahhh, I didn't read the screenshot I just read the cast text. Yeah, I think what that's useful. But I don't think it's really retrofunding it's more like traditional investment, right?

What if a project is beneficial but can't be gated? E.g. someone makes great memes which draw quality users to farcaster?

the only difference between this and what i’ve proposed is the form of the retroactive funding: an uncertain charity handout from a “dao” vs rev share from customers. i’ll take the later thx