Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I actually think we're probably already at the point where the marginal bit of anti-wokeness is on balance more bad than good. (Not the same as wokeness being good, because anti-wokeness doesn't just fight wokeness, it also has many, IMO mostly bad, side effects) https://twitter.com/0FJAKE/status/1783928239099875386
31 replies
73 recasts
455 reactions
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
What’s missing from anti-wokeness is any positive description of values and preferences worth promoting.
2 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
Ooh you got it briefer than me. How about: If you don’t like what a woke person is advocating then solve their problem another way.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
This implies there’s underlying agreement on the problem / values though. Which I don’t know is always the case
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
If you keep decomposing, every question turns into one where you agree on problems, but disagree on prioritization (is problem X large enough to be worth solving it with method A which creates another problem Y...?) Once at that level, you agree X is a problem, and even if you think it's minor you can try to go solve.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
maybe I'm missing what you're saying, but aren't there still object level disagreements about problems between groups? what was the shared problem MLK and white supremacists agreed on?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ruz.eth 🍄
@ruz.eth
Hmmm… maybe sentiments like “We want to be treated fairly” “We built this country we deserve a part in it” “Please don’t attack us” Not that both groups had an equal claim, but both groups felt like they had *some* claim. Idk.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
