Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
good real-world example of how embedded wallets break identity web3 becoming web2 but instead of email/passwords its now app-specific wallets (identities) to fix, 1) devs must implement one-to-many identity mapping in thier app and, 2) users need to do the work of mapping (which they wont) *in every web3 app they use* is this really a better ux than pasting a seed phrase in a pw manager? is this progress? given lack of web3 consumer growth the market says no
28 replies
21 recasts
126 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
“but jonny, installing a wallet and connecting it to an app is a non-starter for consumers!” cope. all consumer products are pleasure-pain tradeoffs. add pleasure to offset pain
4 replies
5 recasts
56 reactions

Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
AGREED embedded wallets have further fragmented the wallet space at the expense of true interoperability and composability which might be the two biggest benefits when building consumer apps on crypto rails
4 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp
Matthew Fox 🌐
@matthewfox
just making it easy to add those wallets to your farcaster account feels like a good solution I really don't see the future where one wallet usage wins
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Koolkheart pfp
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
If your ‘decentralized’ app dies when a startup fails or a wallet provider changes terms, congrats, you’ve reinvented Web2 with extra gas fees.
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions

eric.base.eth 🔵 pfp
eric.base.eth 🔵
@ericbrown.eth
Smart Wallet announced Sub Accounts at ETH Denver that allows you to create an embedded account that is tied to a parent account to prevent fragmentation while preserving the UX benefits of embedded accounts. We’re actively improving this and would love feedback (cc @montana): https://x.com/montana_wong/status/1907455174416711913?s=46
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

logonaut.eth 🎩🍖↑🔄 pfp
logonaut.eth 🎩🍖↑🔄
@logonaut.eth
on a number of occasions i have noped out of a product i wanted to try purely because i didn’t want another orphaned wallet to deal with. for the most part, using 1password + simplelogin (for email aliasing) for years has been relatively hassle-free — i prefer that experience over having a bunch of embedded wallets foisted on me with assets scattered across them if people don’t want to manage, say, dozens or hundreds of bank accounts, why would they want to deal with similar numbers of embedded wallets?
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Sejal pfp
Sejal
@sejalj
privy solves this!! we have global wallet / cross-app wallet flows that allow devs to both create and access global wallets super easily - so that identity is portable! @nonlinear.eth very curious what you think?
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Henri Stern Ꙫ pfp
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
Balancing dev’s ability to craft a product they love (vs popping users out to a third party surface) with easy composability out of the box for users is key. Lots of progress being made there w sub accounts and session keys. Ultimately, though, users should be free to choose the right model for them.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

matthewb pfp
matthewb
@matthewb
yeah directionally agree with you, it’s just a different set of tradeoffs rather than better/worse. though also worth noting that you can’t put seed phrases in password managers.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
isn't this what ENS is for?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jacek.degen.eth 🎩 pfp
Jacek.degen.eth 🎩
@jacek
Honestly, apps should just let you approve a spend limit—like “FartApp can spend up to $50 USDC.” For no-click checkout, it just works. For normal checkout, you just enter your wallet address and confirm the transaction separately. No need to connect your wallet to every app. It’s simpler, safer, and feels more like 2FA.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

keccers pfp
keccers
@keccers.eth
Sidebar: I am honestly so impressed @loriann recognized her own addy like that. I wouldn’t be able to do that at all
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

Spencer Graham 🧢 pfp
Spencer Graham 🧢
@spengrah.eth
siloed embedded wallets are dumb and have been dumb since 2020 use @getpara
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions

christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
Correct. https://warpcast.com/christopher/0x6b9600c5
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Trigs pfp
Trigs
@trigs
This feels like a relevant study to look at for this: https://warpcast.com/mode-nearchos/0xe4bec1f1
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Kaloh pfp
Kaloh
@kaloh
Yeah this is kind of an issue with digital identity which is a big proposition of onchain anything consumer based
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

max 🎩🚂 pfp
max 🎩🚂
@baseddesigner.eth
I think wallet with funds and wallet as account - could be completely separate things Seed phrase ideally has to fall back on something to make sure it can be recovered or changed in case of compromise If we have a wallet as account it could be limited to like $5 or no balance completely as you don't need it anyways
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂 pfp
J. Valeska 🦊🎩🫂
@jvaleska.eth
now we are talking real shit
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Crypto Taboo Intern pfp
Crypto Taboo Intern
@cryptotabooteam
Until identity becomes portable and user-owned by default, onboarding will stay broken.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction