Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
one way to think about @fabric: an onchain proposal system that doesn’t require membership in a dao and is not dependent on voter turnout neither the community, nor credible builders with a proven track record of executing, benefit from the bureaucratic overhead of most governance systems (imo) (sorry)
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

mactar pfp
mactar
@mactar
Wasn’t familiar with this protocol but sounds interesting after a brief look!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Brandon pfp
Brandon
@bhgomes
how does it differ from JuiceBox DAO? just the DAO part?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

notdevin  pfp
notdevin
@notdevin.eth
Do you think these concepts should be mutually exclusive to each other, or is it that Fabric can remove an often contentious and consuming concept from a flavor of DAO governance? I want a DAO for orchestrating talent and execution of strategy and products/services, the funding of that is related by tangential
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Manuel pfp
Manuel
@manuelmaccou.eth
Still trying to create the right mental model to separate Fabric from gofundme and kickstarter. Permissionless - the other options are as well (maybe except sanctioned counties?). Onchain: not clear why that’s important other than aligning with values of the target audience. Not criticizing, trying to understand.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

vincent pfp
vincent
@pixel
Found this, "obligation of DAO," maybe relevant to this thread, especially re: discussions with ccarella: https://i.imgur.com/s9QDmOL.png
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jcdenton.vibe pfp
jcdenton.vibe
@jc
The efficiency of GoFundMe vs. charities in the real world attest to this!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction