Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LGHT  pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
v1 of a 'permless grant ecosystem' design more context in an essay but this is good tldr imo spend higher on things you want to go higher
6 replies
23 recasts
126 reactions

Nick Naraghi 🧢 ↑ pfp
Nick Naraghi 🧢 ↑
@nintynick.eth
this is awesome. who determines which projects get grants? stoked to see the essay
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

LGHT  pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
core intent is that anyone who holds $higher determines who gets grants token as an ability to coordinate complimentary agents for ideas the holder has but can not build solo higher collective has around 8M $higher atm for example so they determine how those 8m get dispersed based on their own opinions
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions

Nick Naraghi 🧢 ↑ pfp
Nick Naraghi 🧢 ↑
@nintynick.eth
so a DAO? are all $higher tokenholders in the higher collective, or two different sets of agents?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

LGHT  pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
a v left curve one yes higher collective is not higher - it's a party that core contributors started to pool higher for retro grants and such (higher.party) https://x.com/0xlght/status/1774648757734281239
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nick Naraghi 🧢 ↑ pfp
Nick Naraghi 🧢 ↑
@nintynick.eth
sick, makes sense. I've helped a bunch of folks form grant committees with hats and I love higher, so happy to help here if I can
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

LGHT  pfp
LGHT
@lght.eth
amazing, will circle back on this!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction