Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chase Sommer
@chasesommer.eth
Whenever I see another L2 or L3, I always think about the early internet when it was a bunch of private networks that were not linked up. If history is a lesson, would that imply that there will be one that will emerge as the "winner"? Where is my thought process going wrong?
3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
Nico🦊
@nicom
It's very probable that user experience tends toward making them think there's only one network but it may be the same as the internet. The common protocols makes it possible to interact with all the networks the same way but it's actually very fragmented: many hardware techs, many connections providers, many software protocols implementation, some protocols running in parallel, some taking time to get deprecated and majority usage driving them. I don't really see The Internet as one thing. It's what users see, but that's an illusion. It's the same for crypto.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chase Sommer
@chasesommer.eth
Ah this is pretty helpful for me - ty But one thing is that each new L2/L3 advertises itself as a new place to X activity to thrive, which I feel like is different from the internet? Unless L2/L3's are like FANG with their own apps layers. Like overall, the internet appeared fragmented from user side early on and now L2/L3's seem fragmented from user side. I suppose I'm saying will something unify all the layers eventually so that users won't realize there's a difference in underlying tech? idk if my question make sense
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
