Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
ironically leaving farcon more bearish on farcaster. the protocol wants to compete and win at the client level. clients want to win and avoid being dependent on the protocol. all roads lead to winner take all. what’s the point?
43 replies
6 recasts
99 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Wrote up my thoughts here. Thanks for the nudge. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x16de8c53
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
0xdesigner
@0xdesigner
say you're able to grow qDAU and successfully empower other clients (hypothetically). another client (a non twitter clone) achieves escape velocity user growth, far exceeding any other on the protocol. why wouldn't they fork farcaster? they could presumably achieve consensus of the new thing with enough scale.
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Nicolaus
@nicolaus
This growth & fork you’re describing actually sounds like a win for Farcaster. Someone who has successfully used FC to build a unique product vision with enough DAU is likely to do just that. People building on Farcaster will continue its growth by making it easier for more successes like that to happen.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nicolaus
@nicolaus
The timing would happen when that client could feel confident it’s captured every feature and product needed to self-sustain off that fork and keep growing independently. Till then, the client would look for the protocol for help with those features, which encourages more building on the protocol.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
